99 Ways to Influence Change, #86: Assign responsibility

Change doesn’t spontaneously happen on its own.  If you want something to change, it must have someone’s name attached.  The people who must take on the change, or incorporate it into their job, must know that it is theirs to do so.  To influence change, assign responsibility.

The first reason to assign responsibility is to make sure it gets done.  Give people responsibility for tasks and decisions.  Put their initials in the meeting minutes next to the things they need to do.  Also, encourage people to take responsibility for their own responses, behaviors, and attitudes regarding the change.

Another purpose of assigning responsibility is to pass on ownership of the project.  When people are responsible for a piece of the change, they feel more in control of their change experience.  And more control means less resistance to the change itself.  Let people know that the change is not happening to them, but with their own power.

Last, you can’t do everything yourself to implement the change.  Delegate, and allow people the authority to get things done and move the project forward.

To whom might you assign responsibility?

Read more of the 99 Ways to Influence Change.

99 Ways to Influence Change, #64: Hold them accountable

Change often requires that a number of people agree to take on tasks that they will perform on their own.  The odds are reduced that people will follow through on their commitments if they believe no one will follow up and make sure that they did it.  To influence change, hold people accountable.

Keep track of the things people say they will do, and check in to see if they have completed them.  Give them a forum to report their progress.  Help people stay on task and on time.  Discuss how they can effectively be held accountable, and define what that means.  Make sure to agree on the consequences if they don’t maintain their part of the project.

When someone doesn’t follow through, explore what happened that prevented them from success; not to find fault, but to better understand what is holding them back.  Then help them find what they need to succeed.  If there were defined consequences, always follow through.

How might you hold people accountable for implementing the change?

Read more of the 99 Ways to Influence Change.

Radio Show: Monitor Your Organization’s “Non-Verbal” Communication

This morning on The Change Agent’s Dilemma radio show, I talked about how most of your organization’s communication does not happen through official communication channels.  Based on the popular article by the same name, today’s show includes additional examples of “non-verbal” communication gone awry.

If you want to know why your internal change communication doesn’t seem to be landing, listen to this show!

Listen here (30 minutes):

Be sure to visit the radio show page to listen to past episodes and subscribe to the show.

On the Radio: Ten Essential Tools for Change Agents

This morning on The Change Agent’s Dilemma radio show, I shared Ten Essential Tools for Change Agents.

The Ten Essential Tools include personal influence and structural influence methods, plus a focused foundation that every change agent needs to start with.  If your change initiative is stalled, use the Ten Tools as a checklist to see what areas might be in need of a boost.

Listen here (30 minutes):

Be sure to visit the new radio show page to find other ways you can tune in to the show.

If you prefer to read a small synopsis of the list, see the previous post Ten Essential Tools for Change Agents.  However, you will miss out on a special offer that is presented at the end of the show!

Interview: Performance Management Design for Organizational Change

This morning on The Change Agent’s Dilemma radio show, I interviewed Dr. Janet Hecht of Talent by Design Consulting, LLC about how to design a performance management system for organizational change.

Janet shared the components of an effective performance management design and the tips she learned as an employee implementing a performance management system to 55,000 associates at the State of Georgia.  She also warned of some of the pitfalls to avoid when designing and implementing a performance management system.

Listen here (30 minutes):

Be sure to visit the new radio show page to find other ways you can tune in to the show.

Monitor Your Organization’s “Non-Verbal” Communication

It is widely cited that verbal communication makes up only 7% of a total message during a conversation.  That is, 93% percent of the meaning within the conversation comes from outside the words that we use.  These non-verbal aspects of communication include gestures, posture, intonation, and facial expressions.  It turns out the concrete language is by far the least important factor in our interpretation and understanding of what the other person saying.

A similar phenomenon happens in organizations.  Consider that the equivalent to verbal communication in organizations are the formal words that come to employees in the form of official documents:  values and mission statements, strategy, policies, newsletters, websites, announcements, press releases, and other communication devices. The rest of internal communication comes from everything else employees experience.  Similar to a conversation, the vast majority of meaning and understanding is generated by “non-verbal” communication.

The following are examples of “non-verbal” communication in organizations that speak louder than words:

Accountability

Employees assess which policies count and which ones are merely guidelines based on how consistently they are enforced.  Processes and procedures are generally followed to the extent that they are required.

“Everyone must contact the IT helpdesk to resolve computer issues”
(unless you know who to call to avoid waiting).

Rewards

Rewards in all their forms tell employees how to be successful.  Traditional incentive programs signal expectations but may conflict with stated values or even inadvertently motivate a different behavior than what is desired.  Furthermore, who gets promoted and what behaviors elicit praise send powerful messages about what is expected.

“Safety first!”
(Here’s your efficiency bonus.)

Decisions

How managers spend resources speaks volumes about what they truly value and prioritize.  The decisions they make about how to allocate funds and how they spend their own time demonstrates what they believe will lead to success.

“Strategic initiatives are important”
(until we need to cut something out of the budget).

Management behavior

More than anything, employees look at the behavior modeled by management to see if it matches what is officially communicated.  The most influential person in this regard is an employee’s own boss.  The attitudes and behaviors displayed by people in authority tell the real story of what is expected.

“We value employees’ ideas”
(but not the terrible one you just shared).

Employees will rely on “non-verbal” communication to understand what is expected and to decide appropriate action in the midst of uncertainty. When introduced to news of change, many employees will take the stance, “I’ll believe it when I see it.”  It is not enough for them to hear it or read it.   It is imperative to monitor your organization’s “non-verbal” communication to ensure that actions and behaviors are consistent with your official change message.

Interview: Make Personal Accountability a Core Value

qbq-bookThis morning I interviewed John G. Miller, bestselling author of QBQ: The Question Behind the Question and Flipping The Switch as well as the new book Outstanding! 47 Ways to Make Your Organization Exceptional, on my biweekly radio show, The Change Agent’s Dilemma.  The topic was “Make Personal Accountability a Core Value Using the QBQ.”

During the show, John shared his methodology for eliminating blame, complaining and procrastination.  He also talked about the two myths of accountability and much more!

Listen here (30 minutes):

If you are a podcast listener, you may also subscribe to The Change Agent’s Dilemma on iTunes.

Ten Essential Tools for Change Agents

Change agents are individuals within organizations who influence change without having direct authority over people who are going through the change.  The following are ten things that effective change agents use to influence change in their organizations. [Read more...]

Interview: Creating Alignment with Four Questions

This morning I hosted an interview with Jeff Lebow, Co-founder and Principal Consultant of Alignment at Work, LLC, on my biweekly radio show, The Change Agent’s Dilemma.  The topic was “Create Alignment with Four Questions.”

During the show, Jeff shared what alignment is, how it relates to accountability, and how you achieve it.  The key is to gain agreement on the answers to The Four Pull QuestionsSM.

Among my favorite quotes from our discussion is “What goes without saying doesn’t always go.”

Listen here (30 minutes):

If you are a podcast listener, you may also subscribe to The Change Agent’s Dilemma on iTunes.

The first step toward change

When you want something to change, the first thing you need to do is stop complaining about it.

You may not truly whine about it; complaining takes many forms.  Perhaps you lament about it with your colleagues at lunch, or even work yourself into a loathsome frenzy about who is to blame.  You might lead an educated discussion in a meeting about why the current way doesn’t work.  If all you do is point out the problem or the thing that needs changing, you’re complaining.

Complaining is passive.  It assumes no responsibility, and seeks blame.  Complaining means it’s someone else’s job to fix it.

Complaining about wanting something to change usually involves criticizing other people (especially leadership):  their inability to change, or their cluelessness about the problem, or their unwillingness to do something about it.  While popular and cathartic, complaining about others does nothing to solve the problem.  In fact it contributes to your becoming known as someone who talks behind others’ backs – leading to a serious erosion of integrity.

Complaining also locks you into a specific mindset that affects your own willingness to act.  A lot of time and energy is spent watching for confirmation of your complaint and seeking acknowledgment from others that they agree with your assessment.  You stop noticing evidence that change is possible and ignore opportunities to make a difference.

When you stop complaining a marvelous thing happens.  Without an outlet for all the negative information, you stop collecting it.  All the attention spent on proving the problem can now be focused on something infinitely more effective:  finding a path to the solution.

If you truly want to see something change, choose to view the situation as changeable.  Make the conscious decision to stop complaining about what is.  Open yourself up to the possibility that it doesn’t have to be that way, and that you can have a hand in making it better.