<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Standard for Change Management is Flawed &#8211; It&#8217;s Also a Step in the Right Direction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.enclaria.com/2016/01/26/the-standard-for-change-management-is-flawed-its-also-a-step-in-the-right-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.enclaria.com/2016/01/26/the-standard-for-change-management-is-flawed-its-also-a-step-in-the-right-direction/</link>
	<description>Equipping individuals and teams to influence organizational change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Stagl		</title>
		<link>https://www.enclaria.com/2016/01/26/the-standard-for-change-management-is-flawed-its-also-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-87905</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Stagl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enclaria.com/?p=7795#comment-87905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.enclaria.com/2016/01/26/the-standard-for-change-management-is-flawed-its-also-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-87903&quot;&gt;Eduardo Muniz&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Eduardo. According to the ACMP press release from October 2014 when The Standard was announced:
&quot;ACMPâ€™s Standard was developed through a global, voluntary consensus standards development process, consistent with ISO (International Organization for Standardization) practices. Over the course of two years, ACMPâ€™s Standards Working Group engaged over 1,100 change management thought leaders and volunteers from 57 countries, each averaging more than 10 yearsâ€™ experience, to capture, review, adjudicate and respond to more than 3,500 unique comments.&quot;

The Standard for Change Management can be downloaded for free here:  http://www.acmpglobal.org/?ACMPStandard (registration required).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.enclaria.com/2016/01/26/the-standard-for-change-management-is-flawed-its-also-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-87903">Eduardo Muniz</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Eduardo. According to the ACMP press release from October 2014 when The Standard was announced:<br />
&#8220;ACMPâ€™s Standard was developed through a global, voluntary consensus standards development process, consistent with ISO (International Organization for Standardization) practices. Over the course of two years, ACMPâ€™s Standards Working Group engaged over 1,100 change management thought leaders and volunteers from 57 countries, each averaging more than 10 yearsâ€™ experience, to capture, review, adjudicate and respond to more than 3,500 unique comments.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Standard for Change Management can be downloaded for free here:  <a href="http://www.acmpglobal.org/?ACMPStandard" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.acmpglobal.org/?ACMPStandard</a> (registration required).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduardo Muniz		</title>
		<link>https://www.enclaria.com/2016/01/26/the-standard-for-change-management-is-flawed-its-also-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-87903</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduardo Muniz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enclaria.com/?p=7795#comment-87903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Heather. Great points. Besides lacking specifics, I also could&#039;t see the rational behind the standards.

How was it determined? What information (Change implementation experience?) was it used to determine the standard? 

Has it ever been achieved?

I am interested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heather. Great points. Besides lacking specifics, I also could&#8217;t see the rational behind the standards.</p>
<p>How was it determined? What information (Change implementation experience?) was it used to determine the standard? </p>
<p>Has it ever been achieved?</p>
<p>I am interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
