<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Strategy Map Template	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.enclaria.com/2009/04/24/strategy-map-template/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.enclaria.com/2009/04/24/strategy-map-template/</link>
	<description>Equipping individuals and teams to influence organizational change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Stagl		</title>
		<link>https://www.enclaria.com/2009/04/24/strategy-map-template/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Stagl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enclaria.com/?p=1010#comment-46</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.enclaria.com/2009/04/24/strategy-map-template/comment-page-1/#comment-45&quot;&gt;Kanishk Rastogi&lt;/a&gt;.

The themes are groups of objectives - since there are usually many in the Process Perspective, it helps to group them.  The themes also add another layer of clarification of what is important to the organization.

Since the themes are categories, often you will see some objectives (bubbles) that overlap themes.  For example, let&#039;s say you have an Innovation Theme and an Operational Excellence theme.  If you have an objective called Improve Innovation Process, then that objective would overlap the two themes.

The objectives in the Process Perspective can - and in fact should - contribute to either the Customer Perspective or the Financial Perspective.  One of the most informative pieces of the strategy map is how the objectives are linked in cause-and-effect relationships.  In the template I have general arrows between perspectives, but I have frequently seen maps that have direct lines showing the cause-and-effect between individual objectives.  In combination with a good scorecard and a lot of data, some companies even do in-depth analysis to prove/disprove these linkages, essentially testing the logic of their strategy.

Thank you for the question.  If you would like more detail, I would be happy to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enclaria.com/contact/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;connect&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.enclaria.com/2009/04/24/strategy-map-template/comment-page-1/#comment-45">Kanishk Rastogi</a>.</p>
<p>The themes are groups of objectives &#8211; since there are usually many in the Process Perspective, it helps to group them.  The themes also add another layer of clarification of what is important to the organization.</p>
<p>Since the themes are categories, often you will see some objectives (bubbles) that overlap themes.  For example, let&#8217;s say you have an Innovation Theme and an Operational Excellence theme.  If you have an objective called Improve Innovation Process, then that objective would overlap the two themes.</p>
<p>The objectives in the Process Perspective can &#8211; and in fact should &#8211; contribute to either the Customer Perspective or the Financial Perspective.  One of the most informative pieces of the strategy map is how the objectives are linked in cause-and-effect relationships.  In the template I have general arrows between perspectives, but I have frequently seen maps that have direct lines showing the cause-and-effect between individual objectives.  In combination with a good scorecard and a lot of data, some companies even do in-depth analysis to prove/disprove these linkages, essentially testing the logic of their strategy.</p>
<p>Thank you for the question.  If you would like more detail, I would be happy to <a href="http://www.enclaria.com/contact/" rel="nofollow">connect</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kanishk Rastogi		</title>
		<link>https://www.enclaria.com/2009/04/24/strategy-map-template/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kanishk Rastogi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 23:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enclaria.com/?p=1010#comment-45</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this great template. It is surely a very good visual representation of the change strategy and can serve as a great communication tool too. I noticed that the bubbles in the &quot;Process Perspective&quot; layer overlap different themes. Does that mean that different process improvement initiatives can contribute together towards the Customer Perspective layer?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this great template. It is surely a very good visual representation of the change strategy and can serve as a great communication tool too. I noticed that the bubbles in the &#8220;Process Perspective&#8221; layer overlap different themes. Does that mean that different process improvement initiatives can contribute together towards the Customer Perspective layer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
